I routinely accuse convertskii of not understanding Reformed theology before they get enamored with high church claims. It is only fair that I offer a survey of texts that one should know before declaring the Reformed faith wrong. People will say, “But that’s too intellectual. Christianity is a life.” Perhaps, but people will always default back to logical decisions, sneers at “Westernism” notwithstanding. And I have read most of your top guys, so it’s only fair. And Bradley Nassif agrees with me, so there.
I am not saying you have to read all of these before you go to a different tradition. What I am saying is if you publicly assert that Protestantism is wrong because of ____________, and the following men have addressed your arguments, and you do not engage their arguments, then you do not have good warrant.
Muller, Richard. Calvin and the Reformed Tradition. The high-point of Calvin studies by the world’s leading Reformation scholar. It will teach readers to stop saying silly things like “Calvinism” or “TULIP is Reformed theology.”
Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology volume 3. If you can give competent responses to Hodge’s defense of justification by free grace, then you know Reformed theology.
Turretin, Francis. Institutes of Elenctic Theology volume 2. Best defense of Reformed anthropology and Christ’s priestly intercession. If you still believe in talking to dead people after Turretin, then I tip my hat to you.
Horton, Michael. Lord and Servant: A Covenant Christology. If you still hold to a pure Christus Victor atonement theory, or you still hold to estrangement ontology, then you’ve earned your keep.
Jenson, Robert. Systematic Theology volume 1. If you believe that the Essence/Energies is logically, biblically, and theologically tenable, you must address Jenson’s critique of it.
McCormack, Bruce. Orthodox and Modern. You don’t have to read the whole book–just pages 205, 218-222. If you can answer McCormack, then you are warranted in believing in a God behind the Persons who are behind the Energies.