Probably supralap

I used to default to Dabney’s view on the lapsarian debate (e.g., “who cares?”).  Five years ago I thought that Reymond made the best case for supralapsarian, but since Reymond was wacky on other issues, I didn’t care too much.  I just listened to Packer’s lectures on the Puritans, and while Packer is infralap, his exposition of Perkins’ supralapsarianism was so clear, and having remembered Gordon Clark’s talks on it from my summer studies, I realized Supralap made the most sense.